Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Petra CRE CDO 2007-1, Ltd., etc., respondent, v. 160 Jamaica Owners, LLC, et al., appellants, et al., defendants.
Argued-April 15, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants 160 Jamaica Owners, LLC, Richard Cohen, Kenneth Olson, and Poko Management Corp. appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Nelson, J.), entered August 7, 2009, as granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against them and dismissing their counterclaim, and to appoint a referee to compute the amount due to the plaintiff.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting proof of the existence of the mortgage, the unpaid note, and the appellants' default in payment (see Republic Natl. Bank of N.Y. v O'Kane, 308 A.D.2d 482; Village Bank v. Wild Oaks Holding, 196 A.D.2d 812). In opposition, the appellants raised various affirmative defenses, including, inter alia, breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and asserted a counterclaim for damages. However, in the loan documents, the appellants validly waived all defenses, counterclaims, and setoffs (see Bank of Suffolk County v. Kite, 49 N.Y.2d 827, 828; Quest Commercial, LLC v. Rovner, 35 AD3d 576; PGA Mktg. v. Windsor Plumbing Supply, 124 A.D.2d 576, 577). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the appellants, and dismissing their counterclaim, and to appoint a referee to compute the amount due to the plaintiff.
RIVERA, J.P., FISHER, FLORIO and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-08675 (Index No. 29337 /08)
Decided: May 11, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)