Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Garo Alexanian, appellant, v City of New York, et al., respondents.
Submitted-March 23, 2010
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, dated July 30, 2008, which, after a hearing, confirmed a determination of a hearing officer dated March 3, 2008, made after a hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of violating 22 RCNY Health Code § 11.29 (former 22 RCNY Health Code 11.66), by failing to show to a health inspector, upon request, proof that his dog had been vaccinated for rabies, and fining him $500.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
Judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body after a hearing is limited to whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Purdy v. Kreisberg, 47 N.Y.2d 354, 358; Matter of Sands v. Daines, 69 AD3d 862, lv denied NY3d, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op 67569 [2010] ). Here, the determination of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene was supported by substantial evidence in the record. The petitioner admitted that he failed to produce the required vaccination certificate for the subject dog either during the home inspection or at the hearing before the hearing examiner.
The petitioner's remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or without merit.
RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, FLORIO and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-04815 (Index No. 24883 /08)
Decided: May 04, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)