Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ramona Valentin, respondent, v. City of New York, defendant, Steven Barreto, appellant.
Submitted-April 21, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Steven Barreto appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), dated October 7, 2009, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a) to vacate an order of the same court dated April 16, 2008, granting the plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to enter judgment against him upon his failure to appear or answer.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellant's motion pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(1) to vacate an order dated April 16, 2008, granting the plaintiff's unopposed motion for leave to enter judgment against him was properly denied, as it was not made within one year after service of a copy of the order with notice of entry (see Matter of Putnam County Natl Bank v JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., 57 AD3d 677, 678; Malik v. Noe, 54 AD3d 733, 734; Levine v. Berlin, 46 A.D.2d 902). Furthermore, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in not extending the time period, since the appellant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his delay in moving to vacate the order (see Hosten v. Oladapo, 44 AD3d 1006, 1007; Katz v. Perl, 22 AD3d 806, 807), and failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his failure to answer the complaint (see CPLR 5015[a][1]; Matter of Nieto, 70 AD3d 831; Dorrer v. Berry, 37 AD3d 519; Awad v. Severino, 122 A.D.2d 242; Passalacqua v. Banat, 103 A.D.2d 769).
FISHER, J.P., COVELLO, BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-10893 (Index No. 27578 /07)
Decided: May 04, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)