Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Veronica Christian, appellant, v. Joshua Samuel Graham, respondent, et al., defendant.
Submitted-March 23, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust upon certain real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Adams, J.), dated June 18, 2009, as, after a nonjury trial, granted the motion of the defendant Joshua Samuel Graham pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law, made at the close of evidence, and is in favor of that defendant and against her, dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondent, for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the CPLR and the Rules of this Court (see CPLR 5528[a]; 22 NYCRR 670.10.2[c][1] ).
“An appellant who perfects an appeal by using the appendix method must file an appendix that contains all the relevant portions of the record in order to enable the court to render an informed decision on the merits of the appeal” (Matter of Passalacqua, 31 AD3d 648, 648 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Cohen v. 1651 Carroll Realty Corp., 23 AD3d 603). Here, the appellant failed to provide this Court with an appendix containing a copy of the relevant portions of the trial transcript which is necessary to review the order and judgment appealed from (see Ayers v. Ayers, 37 AD3d 629, 630; Matter of Passalacqua, 31 AD3d 648; Cohen v. 1651 Carroll Realty Corp., 23 AD3d 603). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed.
RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, FLORIO and BALKIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-07032 (Index No. 2759 /05)
Decided: May 04, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)