Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kyle S. BRADLEY, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered December 3, 2007, convicting defendant following a nonjury trial of the crime of leaving the scene of an incident without reporting.
Defendant struck and killed a 17-year-old boy who was riding a bicycle on the shoulder of a country road on a rainy night. After a nonjury trial, defendant was acquitted of manslaughter in the second degree, but was convicted of leaving the scene of an incident without reporting after he failed to stop or notify the authorities of the accident. County Court imposed upon defendant, among other things, the maximum possible sentence of 21/313 to 7 years in prison. Defendant now appeals, challenging only the severity of his sentence.
A sentence will not be disturbed by this Court absent an abuse of discretion by County Court or the existence of extraordinary circumstances (see People v. Peryea, 68 AD3d 1144, 1147 [2009]; People v. Perkins, 56 AD3d 944, 946 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 786 [2009] ). Here, the record demonstrates that there is a reasonable probability that defendant was aware that he had struck a person with his vehicle and refused to stop or notify the authorities despite an entreatment to do so by his passenger. Defendant's conduct resulted in the boy's body not having been discovered until the day following the accident. Additionally, the sentencing court took note of defendant's lengthy prior involvement with law enforcement in both New York and Pennsylvania, which included a multitude of vehicular violations and prior instances of attempting to elude law enforcement. As such, we cannot say that the sentencing court abused its discretion or extraordinary circumstances exist warranting the modification of the maximum sentence imposed upon defendant (see People v. Palmateer, 290 A.D.2d 728 [2002]; People v. Lewis, 162 A.D.2d 760, 764-765 [1990], lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 894 [1990] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 22, 2010
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)