Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Joseph CALVELLO, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Collini, J.), rendered March 27, 2009, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.
The defendant moved to disqualify the Richmond County District Attorney's Office (hereinafter the DA's office) based upon an alleged conflict of interest arising out of the fact that he was represented in civil matters by an attorney who was the spouse of the then Bureau Chief of the Investigations Unit of the DA's office. By pleading guilty, the defendant automatically forfeited his right to appellate review of the denial of his motion to disqualify the DA's Office (see People v. Konieczny, 2 N.Y.3d 569, 780 N.Y.S.2d 546, 813 N.E.2d 626; People v. Hansen, 95 N.Y.2d 227, 715 N.Y.S.2d 369, 738 N.E.2d 773; People v. Di Raffaele, 55 N.Y.2d 234, 448 N.Y.S.2d 448, 433 N.E.2d 513; People v. Bump, 103 A.D.2d 974, 479 N.Y.S.2d 829). Contrary to the defendant's contention, because his right to appellate review of this claim was forfeited, the defendant may not raise this issue on appeal, despite his plea being expressly conditioned, with the approval of the court, on his right to appeal the ruling (see People v. Di Donato, 87 N.Y.2d 992, 642 N.Y.S.2d 616, 665 N.E.2d 186; People v. O'Brien, 56 N.Y.2d 1009, 453 N.Y.S.2d 638, 439 N.E.2d 354; People v. Thomas, 53 N.Y.2d 338, 441 N.Y.S.2d 650, 424 N.E.2d 537; People v. Ward, 174 A.D.2d 589, 570 N.Y.S.2d 690).
However, as it is clear from the record that the defendant pleaded guilty in reliance upon a promise from the Supreme Court that could not be fulfilled, the defendant is entitled to withdraw his plea of guilty, if he is so advised, and the defendant has stated in his brief that, under these circumstances, he would want to withdraw his plea (see People v. Di Raffaele, 55 N.Y.2d 234, 448 N.Y.S.2d 448, 433 N.E.2d 513; People v. Selikoff, 35 N.Y.2d 227, 360 N.Y.S.2d 623, 318 N.E.2d 784, cert. denied 419 U.S. 1122, 95 S.Ct. 806, 42 L.Ed.2d 822; People v. McCready, 296 A.D.2d 423, 745 N.Y.S.2d 455; People v. Ward, 174 A.D.2d 589, 570 N.Y.S.2d 690; People v. King, 152 A.D.2d 815, 543 N.Y.S.2d 763).
In view of the foregoing, we do not pass upon the merits of the defendant's motion.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 09, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)