Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Ronald John Skolinsky, deceased. Elaine Villafana, respondent; Maureen L. Barry, et al., objectants-appellants; Friars of the Atonement, Inc., intervenor-respondent; et al., distributee- respondent.
Submitted-January 15, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
Kieffer and Hahn LLP, New York, N.Y. (Michael C. Devine of counsel), for objectants-appellants.
In a probate proceeding, the objectants Maureen Barry, JoRita DeFrancesco, Daniel P. Flynn, Robert J. Higgins, Patricia M. Hornik, and Adrian Leahy appeal from so much of an order of the Surrogate's Court, Putnam County (Reitz, S.), dated January 22, 2009, as denied that branch of their motion pursuant to SCPA 1404 which was to compel the disclosure of certain documents.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondent and the intervenor-respondent.
Parties are entitled to disclosure of all matter “material and necessary” to prosecution of the action (CPLR 3101[a]; see Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publ. Co., 21 N.Y.2d 403, 406; Trimarco v. Data Treasury Corp., 59 AD3d 615). Upon an in camera inspection of the documents at issue here, consisting of the minutes of the General Council meetings of the intervenor Friars of Atonement, Inc., from March 16, 1985, through March 15, 1990, the Surrogate's Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the appellants' motion which was to compel production of those minutes (see Andon v. 302-304 Mott St. Assoc., 94 N.Y.2d 740, 745; Vyas v. Campbell, 4 AD3d 417, 418).
The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.
The intervenor's remaining contention has been rendered academic in light of our determination.
RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and HALL, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-03304 (Index No. 128 /06)
Decided: February 09, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)