Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Darlene Albury, et al., appellants, v Terrence O'Reilly, Jr., et al., respondents.
Argued-January 4, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Elliot, J.), entered March 17, 2008, as, upon a jury verdict, awarded the plaintiff Darlene Albury damages in the sum of only $30,000 for past pain and suffering and $0 for future damages.
ORDERED that the appeal by the plaintiff William Albury is dismissed on the ground that he is not aggrieved by the portion of the judgment appealed from (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the plaintiff Darlene Albury, with costs.
The trial court did not err in declining to charge the jury on the permanent loss of use category of Insurance Law § 5102(d). In order to qualify as a serious injury within the meaning of the no-fault statute, a “permanent loss of use” must be total (Oberly v. Bangs Ambulance, 96 N.Y.2d 295, 297 [internal quotation marks omitted] ). The plaintiff Darlene Albury did not sustain a total loss of use of any body part or organ. Therefore, the court properly declined to charge the jury on this category of serious injury.
The amount of the damages awards in question did not deviate materially from what
would be reasonable compensation (see CPLR 5501).
The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.
SKELOS, J.P., SANTUCCI, DICKERSON and ROMAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2008-03668 (Index No. 24581 /02)
Decided: February 02, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)