Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jerry Babio, et al., appellants, v Westchester County Department of Correction, et al., respondents.
Argued-December 14, 2009
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award dated December 28, 2007, the petitioners appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered September 11, 2008, which denied the petition and granted the cross motion of the Westchester County Department of Correction and the County of Westchester, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the proceeding as untimely, and (2) a judgment of the same court dated December 2, 2008, which, upon the order, dismissed the proceeding as untimely.
ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.
The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501[a][1] ).
A proceeding to vacate or modify an arbitration award must be commenced within 90 days of receipt of the arbitrator's determination (see CPLR 7511[a]; Matter of Case v. Monroe Community Coll., 89 N.Y.2d 438, 441-442). Here, the petitioners received a copy of the arbitrator's determination, at the latest, on January 2, 2008, the operative date from which to measure the 90-day statute of limitations (see CPLR 2103[b][2] ). This proceeding, however, was commenced by the filing of a petition on or about May 21, 2008. Therefore, the proceeding was untimely commenced (see Matter of McRae v. New York City Tr. Auth., 39 AD3d 861; Matter of Pender v New York State Off. of Mental Retardation & Dev. Disabilities, 27 AD3d 756, 757).
The parties' remaining contentions are without merit or have been rendered academic in light of our determination.
COVELLO, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2008-10796 2009-00513 (Index No. 11709 /08)
Decided: February 02, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)