The People, etc., respondent, v. Michael Mathsen, appellant. (2010)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The People, etc., respondent, v. Michael Mathsen, appellant.

2008-10254 2010-00460 2010-00461 (Ind.Nos. 08-00170, 08-00171, S.C.I. No. 08-00339)

Decided: February 02, 2010

STEVEN W. FISHER, J.P. FRED T. SANTUCCI DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO L. PRISCILLA HALL PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.

James D. Licata, New City, N.Y. (Lois Cappelletti of counsel), for appellant. Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.

Submitted-January 6, 2010

DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Rockland County (Alfieri, J.), all rendered September 22, 2008, convicting him of burglary in the first degree under Indictment No. 08-00170, burglary in the third degree under Indictment No. 08-00171, and burglary in the third degree under Superior Court Information No. 08-00339, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty with the full understanding that he would receive the sentences actually imposed and, therefore, he has no basis now to complain that his sentences are excessive (see People v. Ubiles, 59 AD3d 572; People v. Grigg, 53 AD3d 629, 630; People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 817). In any event, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 308; People v. Alvarez, 166 A.D.2d 603; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

FISHER, J.P., SANTUCCI, ANGIOLILLO, HALL and LOTT, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network