Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Calvin YOUNG, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), imposed June 14, 2007, upon his conviction of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being a determinate term of 2 1/2 years imprisonment, and a period of postrelease supervision of 5 years.
ORDERED that the sentence is modified, on the law, by vacating the period of postrelease supervision of five years; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for the imposition of an appropriate period of postrelease supervision in accordance with Penal Law § 70.45(2)(e).
The defendant's valid and unrestricted waiver of his right to appeal, executed as part of his plea agreement, precludes review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145; People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 675 N.Y.S.2d 327, 698 N.E.2d 46; People v. White, 62 A.D.3d 916, 878 N.Y.S.2d 626). However, the defendant's waiver of the right to appeal does not bar this court from reviewing the legality of his sentence (see People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 9, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022; People v. Holcomb, 61 A.D.3d 1356, 876 N.Y.S.2d 813; People v. Jennings, 60 A.D.3d 694, 874 N.Y.S.2d 553; People v. Jenkins, 46 A.D.3d 392, 848 N.Y.S.2d 620; People v. Nicholas, 8 A.D.3d 300, 777 N.Y.S.2d 321). Although the presentence report indicates that the defendant previously was convicted of a nonviolent felony, he was never arraigned on a predicate felony offender statement, or adjudicated a second felony offender. Accordingly, the Supreme Court could not have properly sentenced the defendant to a five-year period of postrelease supervision as a second felony offender (see People v. Cole, 31 A.D.3d 1190, 817 N.Y.S.2d 548; People v. Coffie, 272 A.D.2d 870, 709 N.Y.S.2d 262). As a first violent felony offender convicted of the class E violent felony of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, the defendant was subject to a mandatory period of postrelease supervision of not less than 1 1/2 years nor greater than 3 years (see Penal Law §§ 70.02[3][d], 70.45[2][e] ). Since the five-year period of postrelease supervision imposed by the court exceeds the statutory maximum, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for the imposition of an appropriate period of postrelease supervision in accordance with Penal Law § 70.45(2)(e).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 27, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)