Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. David WILLIS, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), rendered May 3, 2007, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was a passenger in a vehicle that was lawfully stopped for Vehicle and Traffic Law infractions. The officer who stopped the vehicle had the discretionary authority to order the defendant out of the vehicle on that basis alone (see People v. Robinson, 74 N.Y.2d 773, 774, 545 N.Y.S.2d 90, 543 N.E.2d 733, cert. denied 493 U.S. 966, 110 S.Ct. 411, 107 L.Ed.2d 376; People v. Henderson, 26 A.D.3d 444, 445, 809 N.Y.S.2d 567; People v. Carr, 24 A.D.3d 566, 567, 806 N.Y.S.2d 683; People v. Forbes, 283 A.D.2d 92, 94-95, 728 N.Y.S.2d 64). Additionally, upon speaking to the operator, the officer detected the odor of burning marijuana emanating from the vehicle and, upon inquiry, the defendant admitted to having smoked marijuana earlier that night. The defendant was lawfully directed to exit the vehicle (see People v. Dugan, 57 A.D.3d 300, 869 N.Y.S.2d 57; People v. Sutherland, 40 A.D.3d 890, 891, 837 N.Y.S.2d 662; People v. Brabham, 13 A.D.3d 388, 785 N.Y.S.2d 530; People v. Pierre, 8 A.D.3d 904, 780 N.Y.S.2d 389). As the defendant moved to exit the vehicle, the officer observed the butt of a revolver sticking out of the right front pocket of the defendant's pants. The weapon was lawfully seized and, therefore, that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress the weapon was properly denied.
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit (see People v. Henry, 52 A.D.3d 841, 843, 860 N.Y.S.2d 619).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 20, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)