Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Carlos LOZADA, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
As the result of an authorized mail watch, correction officials discovered letters from petitioner to inmates in other correctional facilities secreted in a letter sent by petitioner to his daughter. Based on this discovery, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with failing to comply with correspondence procedures, smuggling, impersonation, providing legal assistance to another inmate and making an unauthorized exchange. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of smuggling, impersonation and failing to comply with correspondence procedures, and found not guilty of the remaining charges. This determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the correspondence intercepted through the mail watch and the hearing testimony, provide substantial evidence to support the determination (see Matter of Knight v. McGinnis, 14 A.D.3d 984, 984, 787 N.Y.S.2d 920 [2005] ). Contrary to petitioner's contention, the written authorization for the mail watch signed by the facility Superintendent satisfied the requirements of 7 NYCRR 720.3(e)(1) (see Matter of Devivo v. Bezio, 63 A.D.3d 1489, 1490, 881 N.Y.S.2d 547 [2009] ). Moreover, the Hearing Officer was not required to independently assess the credibility of the confidential information that prompted the mail watch, as that information was not considered in determining petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Muller v. Fischer, 62 A.D.3d 1191, 1191-1192, 881 N.Y.S.2d 188 [2009]; Matter of Kirby v. Leclaire, 47 A.D.3d 1174, 1175, 850 N.Y.S.2d 300 [2008] ). Petitioner's remaining claims are either unpreserved for our review or without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 10, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)