Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Deborah MOTT, Appellant, v. ITT INDUSTRIES et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed September 9, 2008, which ruled that claimant's application for workers' compensation benefits was time barred.
Claimant, who performed clerical duties for the employer for over 27 years, was diagnosed with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome in 2006 and applied for workers' compensation benefits. Following hearings, a Workers' Compensation Law Judge disallowed the claim as time barred pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 28. On review, the Workers' Compensation Board affirmed, prompting claimant to appeal.
We reverse. A claim for workers' compensation benefits due to an occupational disease must be filed “within two years after disablement and after the claimant knew or should have known that the disease is or was due to the nature of the employment” (Workers' Compensation Law § 28; see Matter of McNally v. Newsday, 40 A.D.3d 1323, 1324, 835 N.Y.S.2d 780 [2007], lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 809, 844 N.Y.S.2d 785, 876 N.E.2d 514 [2007] ). Here, the Board determined that claimant knew or should have known no later than 2001 that her bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms were related to her employment. We note, however, that notwithstanding claimant's prior awareness that her symptoms were work-related, the Board failed to establish the date of claimant's disablement. Thus, absent “the necessary concomitant finding that claimant's date of disablement was more than two years prior to the filing of her claim for benefits” (Matter of Patterson v. Long Is. Jewish Med. Ctr., 296 A.D.2d 774, 775, 745 N.Y.S.2d 314 [2002]; accord Matter of Coursey v. Applied Minds, Inc., 13 A.D.3d 865, 866, 786 N.Y.S.2d 631 [2004] ), any conclusion on our part concerning whether the Board's overall determination is supported by substantial evidence would be speculative (see Matter of Coursey v. Applied Minds, Inc., 13 A.D.3d at 866, 786 N.Y.S.2d 631; Matter of Patterson v. Long Is. Jewish Med. Ctr., 296 A.D.2d at 775-776, 745 N.Y.S.2d 314; see also Matter of Leary v. NYC Bd. of Educ., 42 A.D.3d 712, 714, 839 N.Y.S.2d 616 [2007] ).
ORDERED that the decision is reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Workers' Compensation Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.
MERCURE, J.P.
SPAIN, MALONE JR., KAVANAGH and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 22, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)