Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Noel Smith, respondent, v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., appellant, Fitzgerald & Fitzgerald, P.C., et al., defendants. (and a third-party action).
Argued-December 15, 2009
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for negligence and conversion, the defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., appeals, as limited by its notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), entered November 26, 2008, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action asserted against it.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondent.
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the motion of the defendant Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. (hereinafter Merrill Lynch), which was for summary judgment dismissing the second cause of action asserted against it, which sounds in negligence. Merrill Lynch failed to establish, prima facie, that it did not breach a duty of care to the plaintiff. The record contains evidence that Merrill Lynch was in lawful possession of a settlement check and a request by the plaintiff's attorney to open an account for the benefit of the plaintiff in accordance with an infant compromise order issued by the Supreme Court in an underlying medical malpractice action. There is also evidence that Merrill Lynch misplaced the check, and then failed to inform the plaintiff's guardian, or the plaintiff's attorney, that it did not and/or could not open the account as requested. Based on this evidence, a jury could find that Merrill Lynch failed to exercise ordinary care and diligence in handling the check (see Epic Security Corp. v. Banco Popular, NYLJ, Oct. 10, 1997, at 26, col 3 [Civ Ct New York County]; National Wholesale Liquidators v Barclays Bank of New York, NYLJ, Nov. 2, 1992, at 32, col 4 [Sup Ct Nassau County]; Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Chemical Bank, 117 Misc.2d 601, 603; Roscoe v Central Natl. Bank of Canajoharie, 96 Misc.2d 517; Gramore Stores v. Bankers Trust Co., 93 Misc.2d 112, 114).
FISHER, J.P., MILLER, ENG and HALL, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-00465 (Index No. 9299 /04)
Decided: January 19, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)