Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Glenda Phillips, appellant, v. Isaiah Owens Funeral Service, Inc., et al., defendants, Tuthill Finance, L.P., et al., respondents.
Submitted-December 8, 2009
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to set aside fraudulent conveyances pursuant to Debtor and Creditor Law article 10, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated February 20, 2008, which granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Tuthill Finance, L.P., Wainco, Inc., Jeffrey Wain, Robinowitz Cohlan Dubow & Doherty, LLP, and John T. Doherty which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and (2) an order of the same court dated July 16, 2008, which granted the motion of the defendant People's Bank for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, and declaring that its mortgage lien was superior to the plaintiff's judgment lien.
ORDERED that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
That branch of the motion of the defendants Tuthill Finance, L.P., Wainco, Inc., Jeffrey Wain, Robinowitz Cohlan Dubow & Doherty, LLP, and John T. Doherty (hereinafter the Tuthill defendants) which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and the motion of the defendant People's Bank, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, were properly granted, as the movants established that the mortgage loan and assignment of mortgage at issue were supported by fair consideration and made in good faith and, therefore, the Tuthill defendants and People's Bank cannot be held liable for any fraudulent conveyance in connection with any of the transactions complained of (see Murphy v. Briggs, 89 N.Y. 446). The plaintiff's conclusory claims in opposition to that branch of the motion of the Tuthill defendants, and to the motion of People's Bank, were insufficient to defeat that branch of the Tuthill defendants' motion and the motion of the People's Bank, respectively (see Freedman v. Chemical Constru. Corp., 43 N.Y.2d 260).
DILLON, J.P., FLORIO, HALL and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2008-02955 2008-08427 (Index No. 30258 /06)
Decided: January 19, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)