Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Phyllis MORRIS, deceased. Herman Thomas, petitioner-respondent; Jacqueline Morris, et al., objectants-appellants.
In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 1001 to obtain letters of administration for the estate of Phyllis Morris, the objectants appeal from a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Kings County (Torres, S.), entered September 7, 2007, which, after a hearing, and upon an order of the same court (Seddio, S.), dated May 11, 2007, determining that the petitioner did not abandon the decedent and was qualified as her surviving spouse pursuant to EPTL 5-1.2, decreed that letters of administration be issued to the petitioner.
ORDERED that the decree is affirmed, with costs payable by the objectants-appellants personally.
After the decedent died in 2006, the petitioner, whom the decedent married in 1971, commenced this proceeding pursuant to SCPA 1001 to obtain letters of administration for her estate. The decedent's two daughters (hereinafter the objectants) filed objections to the petition on the grounds that the petitioner was not qualified as a surviving spouse within the meaning of the EPTL because he had abandoned the decedent pursuant to EPTL 5-1.2(a) (5), and had failed to support her pursuant to EPTL 5-1.2(a)(6). A hearing was held on the objections. Although it is undisputed that the parties had little contact with each other after they physically separated in 1974, the objectants failed to establish at the hearing that the separation was without the consent of the decedent (see Matter of Riefberg, 58 N.Y.2d 134, 137-138, 459 N.Y.S.2d 739, 446 N.E.2d 424; Matter of Maiden, 284 N.Y. 429, 431-433, 31 N.E.2d 889; Matter of Mancuso, 281 A.D.2d 874, 722 N.Y.S.2d 651). Thus, they failed to establish that the petitioner abandoned the decedent within the meaning of EPTL 5-1.2 (a)(5). Moreover, the objectants failed to establish that the petitioner had a duty to support the decedent or the means or ability to do so (see Matter of Mancuso, 281 A.D.2d at 874, 722 N.Y.S.2d 651; Matter of Gardner, 176 A.D.2d 142, 574 N.Y.S.2d 28). Thus, the objectants failed to establish that the petitioner was disqualified as a surviving spouse pursuant to EPTL 5-1.2(a)(6). Accordingly, the Surrogate's Court properly decreed that letters of administration be issued to the petitioner.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 05, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)