Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Edmond IANNUZZI, appellant, v. TOWN OF BROOKHAVEN, respondent.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent Town of Brookhaven, dated November 1, 1996, terminating the petitioner's employment as a probationary Laborer in the Department of Waste Management, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), entered October 1, 1997, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
A probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing and without a statement of reasons in the absence of a showing that the termination was for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, in bad faith, or in violation of statutory or decisional law (see, Matter of Bass v. New York City Tr. Auth., 236 A.D.2d 536, 654 N.Y.S.2d 617). The petitioner failed to make such a showing.
In addition, contrary to the petitioner's assertion, the respondent's determination to discharge the petitioner was based upon his unsatisfactory performance and was not arbitrary and capricious, but had a rational basis and was carried out in good faith. The petitioner failed to meet his burden of presenting legal and competent evidence to show a deprivation of his rights, bad faith, or other arbitrary action constituting an abuse of discretion on the part of the respondent (see, Matter of Abbondandolo v. Edwards, 174 A.D.2d 737, 571 N.Y.S.2d 955). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly dismissed this proceeding.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 22, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)