Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Ellen REYES, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 9, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant lost her employment as a customer service representative due to disqualifying misconduct. The record establishes that claimant violated the employer's policy regarding the electronic communication system by forwarding a personal e-mail to half of the company employees while on the telephone with a customer. The record also evidences that claimant put the customer on hold in order to send the e-mail and then asked the customer to repeat information which already had been relayed. Inasmuch as a knowing violation of an employer's established policy or workplace rules may constitute disqualifying misconduct (see Matter of Dzaba [Commissioner of Labor], 6 A.D.3d 907, 774 N.Y.S.2d 886 [2004]; Matter of Graham [Commissioner of Labor], 305 A.D.2d 922, 759 N.Y.S.2d 816 [2003] ), the Board's decision will not be disturbed. A recording of the telephone call and claimant's computer screen indicated that she, in fact, sent the e-mail, and her assertion to the contrary presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Livadas [Commissioner of Labor], 3 A.D.3d 656, 770 N.Y.S.2d 764 [2004] ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 17, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)