Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Veronica A. La CLAIR, Appellant. Research Foundation of State University of New York, Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Appeals (1) from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 13, 2000, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant's request for a hearing was untimely, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed October 25, 2000, which, upon reconsideration, ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Claimant challenges the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision that she voluntarily resigned her position as a part-time tutor without good cause. Claimant left because she believed the employer would be unable to assign her a minimum of 20 hours of work per week, despite the employer's request that she delay her resignation while it attempted to adjust her work schedule.1 It is well settled that “dissatisfaction with the number of hours assigned by one's employer does not constitute good cause for resigning” (Matter of Cudnik [Sweeney], 235 A.D.2d 888, 888, 653 N.Y.S.2d 175; see, Matter of Hanukov [Commissioner of Labor], 260 A.D.2d 684, 687 N.Y.S.2d 469). Under these circumstances, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board's assessment of credibility and the inferences drawn from the evidence presented (see, Matter of Wiater [Commissioner of Labor], 267 A.D.2d 578, 699 N.Y.S.2d 511).
ORDERED that the appeal from the decision filed June 13, 2000 is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
ORDERED that the decision filed October 25, 2000 is affirmed, without costs.
FOOTNOTES
1. Although claimant filed a notice of appeal from a June 13, 2000 decision of the Board, the Board later reconsidered that decision and, in an October 25, 2000 decision, overruled its prior determination which had sustained the Commissioner of Labor's objection to the hearing as untimely requested. In light of this determination and claimant's appeal from the October 25, 2000 decision, we deem the appeal from the June 2000 decision to be moot (see, Matter of Greenbaum [Commissioner of Labor], 257 A.D.2d 931, 931, 686 N.Y.S.2d 120 n.).
CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, CREW III, PETERS and SPAIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 01, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)