Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Donnell BRIDGES, Petitioner, v. B. FISHER, as Superintendent of Sing Sing Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner became involved in a physical altercation with another inmate and continued to act in an aggressive manner even after he was ordered to stop, requiring correction officers to use force to restrain him. As a result of this incident, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting, assaulting another inmate, creating a disturbance, refusing a direct order and engaging in violent conduct. At a subsequent tier III disciplinary hearing, he pleaded guilty to fighting and creating a disturbance, guilty with explanation to assaulting another inmate and not guilty to the remaining charges. At the conclusion of the hearing, he was found guilty of all charges except for fighting, and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
Initially, we note that petitioner's guilty plea precludes him from challenging the evidentiary basis of the determination finding him guilty of the charges of creating a disturbance and assaulting another inmate (see Matter of Johnson v. Goord, 300 A.D.2d 785, 786, 750 N.Y.S.2d 799 [2002]; Matter of Perez v. Selsky, 284 A.D.2d 760, 760, 726 N.Y.S.2d 593 [2001] ). With respect to the remaining charges, the misbehavior report, the unusual incident report and related documentation, as well as the testimony at the hearing, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Hernandez v. Selsky, 9 A.D.3d 662, 663, 779 N.Y.S.2d 678 [2004], appeal dismissed, lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 698, 785 N.Y.S.2d 17, 818 N.E.2d 659 [2004]; Matter of Dowdy v. Goord, 2 A.D.3d 1249, 768 N.Y.S.2d 834 [2003] ). The procedural claims raised in the petition have either not been preserved for our review or are lacking in merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 30, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)