Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Nadine NARINE, etc., et al., respondents, v. Farook HUSSAIN, et al., appellants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated July 1, 2004, which granted the plaintiffs' motion, inter alia, to deem the depositions and physical examinations of the plaintiffs by the defendants waived.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the motion is denied on condition that the defendants pay the sum of $600 to the plaintiffs; and it is further,
ORDERED that the depositions and the physical examinations of the plaintiffs may be conducted at a time to be agreed upon by the parties or, in the event the parties cannot agree, at a time to be fixed by the Supreme Court, Queens County, upon application by either of the parties, provided the defendants pay the said sum of $600 to the plaintiffs; and it is further,
ORDERED that the defendants shall have 30 days from the date of service upon them of a copy of this decision and order to pay the sum of $600 to the plaintiffs.
Although the defendants waived their right to depositions and physical examinations of the plaintiffs when they failed to conduct them on the dates set forth in the preliminary conference order, under the circumstances of this case and absent a showing of prejudice to the plaintiffs, the defendants should have been relieved of their waiver (see Vargas v. City of New York, 4 A.D.3d 524, 772 N.Y.S.2d 381; Venia v. 18-05 215th St. Owners, 288 A.D.2d 463, 733 N.Y.S.2d 876; Williams v. Long Is. Coll. Hosp., 147 A.D.2d 558, 537 N.Y.S.2d 853). However, since the defendants failed to proffer a reasonable excuse for their failure to proceed with the scheduled depositions, the denial of the plaintiffs' motion, inter alia, to deem the depositions and physical examinations of the plaintiffs waived should have been conditioned upon the payment of the sum of $600 to the plaintiffs (see Williams v. Long Is. Coll. Hosp., supra; Kanterman v. Palmiotti, 122 A.D.2d 116, 504 N.Y.S.2d 513).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 27, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)