Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Gerald ROWLETT, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered May 11, 2005, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to a determinate term of 7 years imprisonment with 5 years post-release supervision.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence of a determinate term of 7 years imprisonment with 5 years post-release supervision and substituting therefor a sentence of an indeterminate term of 3 1/212 to 7 years imprisonment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
As the People concede, the sentence imposed, a determinate term of 7 years imprisonment with 5 years post-release supervision, was illegal for the defendant's conviction, as a second felony offender, of robbery in the third degree, a nonviolent class D felony (see Penal Law §§ 160.05; 70.02 [1][c]; § 70.06 [2]; § 70.45; People v. McKay, 10 A.D.3d 734, 782 N.Y.S.2d 128). The maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed upon a second felony offender for a conviction of robbery in the third degree is an indeterminate term of 3 1/212 to 7 years, and post-release supervision is only authorized for determinate sentences (see Penal Law §§ 70.06[3][d]; [4] [b]; 70.45). The People request that we vacate the defendant's plea, but that remedy is beyond our power, where, as here, the defendant objects (see Matter of Kisloff v. Covington, 73 N.Y.2d 445, 452, 541 N.Y.S.2d 737, 539 N.E.2d 565; Matter of Campbell v. Pesce, 60 N.Y.2d 165, 169, 468 N.Y.S.2d 865, 456 N.E.2d 806).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 23, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)