Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Doris SOKOL, et al., Respondents, v. Thomas ADDISON, Defendant, June Pelzer, Appellant.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty, the defendant June Pelzer appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Berler, J.), dated June 22, 2001, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
A cause of action to recover damages for fraud does not lie where, as here, the only fraud claimed relates to an alleged breach of contract (see Shah v. Micro Connections, 286 A.D.2d 433, 729 N.Y.S.2d 497; WIT Holding Corp. v. Klein, 282 A.D.2d 527, 724 N.Y.S.2d 66; Weitz v. Smith, 231 A.D.2d 518, 647 N.Y.S.2d 236). The claimed misrepresentations in this case were that money was loaned to the defendants with a promise that the money would be paid back. Such promises, at best, demonstrate a misrepresentation of an intention to perform under a contract, which are insufficient to allege fraud (see WIT Holding Corp. v. Klein, supra; Place v. Ginsburg, 280 A.D.2d 656, 721 N.Y.S.2d 243).
There is no evidence to support the plaintiffs' cause of action to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty. Even assuming that such a duty existed between the plaintiffs and the appellant, there is no evidence that the appellant had superior knowledge or that the plaintiffs reasonably relied upon the appellant's superior knowledge in deciding to loan money to the business run by the defendant Thomas Addison (see generally WIT Holding Corp. v. Klein, supra).
New York does not recognize civil conspiracy to commit a tort as an independent cause of action (see Pappas v. Passias, 271 A.D.2d 420, 707 N.Y.S.2d 178). Since the fraud claim should have been dismissed, the conspiracy cause of action cannot stand alone. Similarly, in the absence of a valid breach of fiduciary duty claim, the cause of action for a constructive trust cannot stand (see Ellner v. Pope, 285 A.D.2d 624, 728 N.Y.S.2d 672).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 15, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)