Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Edward GILHOOLY, respondent, v. DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., defendants third-party plaintiffs, Beskin Corp., third-party defendant-appellant.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the third-party defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), dated May 14, 2007, as granted the plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240(1).
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs payable by the appellant.
In July 2001 the plaintiff, a journeyman carpenter, was hanging sheetrock as part of the construction of a new dormitory building at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. According to his deposition testimony, the plaintiff was standing on a four-foot A-frame aluminum ladder fastening a piece of sheetrock, when the ladder inexplicably “kicked out,” causing him to fall and sustain injuries. This testimony, submitted in support of the plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240(1) (see Hanna v. Gellman, 29 A.D.3d 953, 953-954, 815 N.Y.S.2d 713; Boe v. Gammarati, 26 A.D.3d 351, 351-352, 809 N.Y.S.2d 550; Chlap v. 43rd St.-Second Ave. Corp., 18 A.D.3d 598, 795 N.Y.S.2d 617; Peter v. Nisseli Realty Co., 300 A.D.2d 289, 289-290, 750 N.Y.S.2d 772; Scotti v. Federation Dev. Corp., 289 A.D.2d 322, 323, 734 N.Y.S.2d 573; Guzman v. Gumley-Haft Inc., 274 A.D.2d 555, 556, 712 N.Y.S.2d 45). In opposition, the defendants and the third-party defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiff's own actions were the sole proximate cause of the accident (see Boe v. Gammarati, 26 A.D.3d at 352, 809 N.Y.S.2d 550; Chlap v. 43rd St.-Second Ave. Corp., 18 A.D.3d at 598, 795 N.Y.S.2d 617; Peter v. Nisseli Realty Co., 300 A.D.2d at 290, 750 N.Y.S.2d 772). Consequently, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240(1).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 13, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)