Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Tonia WIDEMAN, etc., et al., appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY, respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silverman, J.), dated August 15, 2007, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3103 for a protective order with respect to the Medicaid and pharmacy records of the plaintiff Tonia Burton pertaining to her pregnancy with the infant plaintiff Tonia Wideman.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The infant plaintiff allegedly sustained physical, emotional, and mental injuries as a result of the ingestion and/or inhalation of particles of lead paint found in the apartment where the plaintiff mother resided during her pregnancy with the infant and where both resided after the infant's birth. The plaintiffs moved pursuant to CPLR 3103 for a protective order after the defendant sought authorizations to obtain the mother's Medicaid and pharmacy records for the period during which the infant was in utero. Since the infant placed her physical and cognitive condition in issue, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs' motion for a protective order with respect to the mother's Medicaid and pharmacy records while the infant was in utero, “during which time there could be no severance of the infant's prenatal history from [her] mother's medical history” (Scharlack v. Richmond Mem. Hosp., 102 A.D.2d 886, 888, 477 N.Y.S.2d 184; see Scipio v. Upsell, 1 A.D.3d 500, 501, 767 N.Y.S.2d 254; Herbst v. Bruhn, 106 A.D.2d 546, 483 N.Y.S.2d 363).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 17, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)