Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Pedro CRUZ, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Spires, J.), rendered December 17, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the indictment is dismissed as to the defendant Pedro Cruz, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally insufficient to establish the defendant's guilt as an accessory of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt (see Penal Law § 170.25). The evidence established that the defendant merely indicated to an undercover police officer who sought to purchase a “social [security card]” that an unapprehended individual referred to as Bores could “hook” him up with someone. There was no evidence that the defendant “solicited, requested, commanded or intentionally aided the principal” (Penal Law § 20.00), in the subsequent creation and possession of the forged Social Security card or in its sale to the undercover police officer. Just as a defendant who merely acts “as a source of general information [as to] where drugs could be purchased” cannot be convicted of the sale of the drug under an accomplice liability theory (People v. Bello, 92 N.Y.2d 523, 527, 683 N.Y.S.2d 168, 705 N.E.2d 1209; see People v. Charles, 11 A.D.3d 321, 783 N.Y.S.2d 539; Matter of Cory P., 240 A.D.2d 749, 660 N.Y.S.2d 39; People v. Johnson, 238 A.D.2d 267, 657 N.Y.S.2d 27; People v. Lopez, 213 A.D.2d 255, 624 N.Y.S.2d 122), the defendant herein could not be convicted as an accomplice to the offense of possession of a forged instrument based solely on evidence that he directed an undercover police officer to a person who could direct him to someone who could provide him with what he wanted.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 05, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)