Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Willie GATHERS, Petitioner, v. Dale ARTUS, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review three determinations of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, an inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul three separate tier II disciplinary determinations, rendered in July 2007, September 2007 and October 2007, which found him guilty of violating numerous prison disciplinary rules.
Initially, with respect to the July 2007 determination, petitioner's challenge thereto is untimely given that he failed to commence this proceeding until after the applicable four-month statute of limitations had expired (see CPLR 217[1]; Matter of Smith v. Goord, 42 A.D.3d 839, 839, 838 N.Y.S.2d 922 [2007] ). Turning to the September 2007 determination, because petitioner has not advanced any arguments in his brief relative to that determination, he has abandoned any claims in connection therewith (see Matter of Whaley v. Goord, 47 A.D.3d 1132, 1133, 850 N.Y.S.2d 281 [2008] ). Lastly, regarding the October 2007 determination, petitioner has already been afforded all of the relief to which he is entitled inasmuch as that determination was administratively reversed, all references thereto were expunged from petitioner's institutional record and the mandatory surcharge imposed was refunded to petitioner (see Matter of Arriaga v. Smith, 55 A.D.3d 1115, 864 N.Y.S.2d 924 [2008] ). Accordingly, his challenge to that determination is moot.
ADJUDGED that the July 2007 and September 2007 determinations are confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed to that extent.
ADJUDGED that the petition, to the extent that it challenges the October 2007 determination, is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 11, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)