Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Demetrios D. GREEN, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (McGrath, J.), rendered November 19, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of criminal contempt in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.
Defendant pleaded guilty to the crimes of criminal contempt in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and waived his right to appeal. Defendant thereafter was sentenced as a second felony offender in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement to concurrent prison terms of 2 to 4 years. Defense counsel now seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant upon the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal.
Although the record establishes that after the sentence was imposed defendant moved to withdraw his plea based upon a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, as noted by County Court, defendant's belated assertion that he had recent information that his attorney did not “act properly” concerned matters outside the record and is more properly the subject of a CPL article 440 motion (see People v. Hemingway, 306 A.D.2d 689, 690, 760 N.Y.S.2d 367 [2003] ). Moreover, the record establishes that defendant indicated during the plea colloquy that he was satisfied with the services of defense counsel and that he was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently pleading guilty. Furthermore, defendant declined to make any statements on his behalf prior to sentencing.
Upon reviewing the record and defense counsel's brief, we agree with the conclusion of defense counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel's application to be relieved of his assignment is granted (see People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, 493 N.Y.S.2d 653 [1985], lv. denied 67 N.Y.2d 650, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1046, 490 N.E.2d 562 [1986]; see generally People v. Stokes, 95 N.Y.2d 633, 722 N.Y.S.2d 217, 744 N.E.2d 1153 [2001] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 15, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)