Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DUANE D. (Anonymous), Appellant.
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, the appeal is from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Rockland County (Stanger, J.), dated July 6, 1994, which, upon the Law Guardian's partial admissions, adjudged the appellant to be a person in need of supervision and placed him in the custody of the Department of Social Services for a period of 18 months for the purpose of being placed with the Children's Home of Kingston.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the petition is dismissed.
We agree with the appellant's contention that the proceeding was so deficient as to render void the determination that he was a person in need of supervision. The record shows that the partial admissions to the allegations contained in the petition were made by the Law Guardian and not the appellant. Although the Law Guardian stated that she was making the admissions “after speaking to [the appellant]”, the record shows that the court never ascertained through allocution that the appellant admitted committing the acts alleged in the petition, that he voluntarily waived his rights to a fact-finding hearing, and that he was aware of the possible dispositional alternatives. Accordingly, the court should not have accepted the admissions (see, Matter of Anthony D., 205 A.D.2d 533, 614 N.Y.S.2d 279; Matter of Shawn D., 179 A.D.2d 755, 579 N.Y.S.2d 1010; Matter of Paul H., 154 A.D.2d 943, 546 N.Y.S.2d 71; Matter of Corey L., 133 A.D.2d 153, 518 N.Y.S.2d 826; Matter of Diallo H., 94 A.D.2d 976, 464 N.Y.S.2d 102; Matter of Kelly Sue N., 94 A.D.2d 976, 464 N.Y.S.2d 101).
However, since the appellant's placement period has terminated, the petition is dismissed, as remitting the matter for a new fact-finding determination is unnecessary (see, Matter of Anthony D., supra).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 29, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)