Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Thomas COFFEY, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director, Inmate Disciplinary Program, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondents which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in two misbehavior reports with disobeying a direct order, failing to following facility regulations and staff directions and two counts of creating a disturbance in violation of certain prison disciplinary rules. The charges stemmed from petitioner's alleged misconduct while being transported to a medical appointment. Following a hearing, petitioner was found guilty of one count of creating a disturbance.1 The misbehavior report written by Correction Officer E. Gokey, who witnessed the incident, stated that petitioner was in a holding area with approximately 37 other inmates and, when informed that he was to be fully handcuffed, petitioner became “extremely argumentative” and had to be placed in a separate room. This, together with the corroborative testimony presented at the hearing, provided substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477; Matter of McMillian v. Goord, 252 A.D.2d 645, 675 N.Y.S.2d 386). Furthermore, we ascertain no error or inconsistency in the determination finding petitioner not guilty of the remaining charges. We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that he was denied the right to call a witness and that the misbehavior reports were fabricated, and find them to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
FOOTNOTES
1. Initially, petitioner also was charged with attempting to escape; however, this charge was dropped prior to the commencement of the disciplinary hearing.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 14, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)