Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Robert VINCI, appellant, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, respondent.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an insurance contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), dated July 27, 2007, which granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), (5), and (7).
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff underwent an abdominoplasty on September 7, 2004, and the defendant insurer denied coverage for the procedure. More than two years later, on April 24, 2007, the plaintiff commenced this action seeking to recover damages for breach of the subject medical insurance contract. Since the insurance contract required such an action to be instituted within two years after the date the disputed medical service was performed, the Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint as time-barred. Parties to a contract may agree to limit the period of time within which an action must be commenced to a shorter period than that provided by the applicable statute of limitations (see CPLR 201; Blitman Constr. Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 66 N.Y.2d 820, 498 N.Y.S.2d 349, 489 N.E.2d 236; Minichello v. Northern Assur. Co. of Am., 304 A.D.2d 731, 758 N.Y.S.2d 669; Schunk v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 237 A.D.2d 913, 914, 655 N.Y.S.2d 210; Saxena v. New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 232 A.D.2d 622, 623, 648 N.Y.S.2d 689).
Further, contrary to the plaintiff's contentions, there is no evidence in the record of any conduct on the part of the defendant insurer that induced the plaintiff into delaying commencement of the action (see Spirig v. Evans, 26 A.D.3d 425, 426, 809 N.Y.S.2d 212).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 07, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)