Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Juliana TURCHUK, Appellant, v. TOWN OF WALLKILL, Respondent.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Murphy, J.), dated December 5, 1997, which granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
In support of its motion for summary judgment, the defendant submitted a report from a physician who examined the plaintiff and found that although the plaintiff had sustained a contusion to the right shoulder, she no longer showed any objective signs of pathology. The defendant therefore demonstrated prima facie entitlement to summary judgment (see, Licari v. Elliott, 57 N.Y.2d 230, 239, 455 N.Y.S.2d 570, 441 N.E.2d 1088; Stallone v. County of Suffolk, 209 A.D.2d 403, 618 N.Y.S.2d 445; Pagano v. Kingsbury, 182 A.D.2d 268, 271, 587 N.Y.S.2d 692; Forte v. Vaccaro, 175 A.D.2d 153, 572 N.Y.S.2d 41).
In opposition, the plaintiff asserted that she could not perform her daily activities for six months after the accident. The plaintiff's self-serving statements concerning her inability to perform household chores for six months after the accident, without more, were insufficient to show that she had sustained a medically-determined injury or impairment of a nonpermanent nature which prevented her from performing substantially all of the material acts which constituted her usual and customary daily activities for a period of not less than 90 days during the 180-day period immediately following the accident (see, Yagliyan v. Gun Shik Yang, 241 A.D.2d 518, 663 N.Y.S.2d 991; Atamian v. Mintz, 216 A.D.2d 430, 628 N.Y.S.2d 367; Zelenak v. Clark, 170 A.D.2d 677, 567 N.Y.S.2d 92; Phillips v. Costa, 160 A.D.2d 855, 554 N.Y.S.2d 288).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 30, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)