Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Shawn GREEN, Petitioner, v. Michael McGINNIS, as Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review two determinations of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in two misbehavior reports with violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The charges stemmed from two incidents in which petitioner refused direct orders to remove sheets that he had hung from his cell bars and, instead, threatened and harassed the correction officer who ordered their removal. Following unsuccessful administrative appeals, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determinations of his guilt. The misbehavior reports written by the correction officer who issued the direct orders provide substantial evidence supporting the determinations of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477). Inasmuch as the record establishes that petitioner refused to appear at the disciplinary hearing regarding the first of the two misbehavior reports, his challenges to any procedural irregularities in connection with the determination of his guilt with respect to this report have been waived (see, Matter of Joyce v. Goord, 246 A.D.2d 926, 667 N.Y.S.2d 833; Matter of Cotton v. Coughlin, 167 A.D.2d 584, 563 N.Y.S.2d 537). Furthermore, petitioner's assertion that the charges contained in the second misbehavior report were fabricated created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, e.g., Matter of Joyce v. Coughlin, 219 A.D.2d 777, 778, 631 N.Y.S.2d 455). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent that they are preserved for our review, are found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determinations are confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 10, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)