Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Michael A.Z. SHABAZZ, Also Known as Michael Hurley, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Punitive Segregation, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules that prohibit making threats and committing an unhygienic act. Introduced into evidence at petitioner's disciplinary hearing was the misbehavior report, written by a correction officer who had witnessed the events in question. The report recited that an inmate porter had been walking down the corridor outside petitioner's cell, distributing hot water for mopping the floor. As the porter passed petitioner's cell, the latter told the porter that he was going “to get” him and then threw a cup of feces at him.
Petitioner challenges the determination of his guilt, contending, inter alia, that the representation provided by his employee assistant in preparing for his disciplinary hearing was inadequate. This contention is belied by the record which discloses that the employee assistant made a good-faith effort to comply with all of petitioner's requests for the production of documents and testimony to be presented at the hearing. In short, petitioner has failed to prove that the assistance he received was inadequate or that his defense was prejudiced in any way thereby (see, Matter of Rodriguez v. Goord, 250 A.D.2d 904, 905, 672 N.Y.S.2d 518, 519; Matter of Garcia v. Selsky, 237 A.D.2d 826, 827, 656 N.Y.S.2d 951). Petitioner's remaining assertions of procedural errors are either without merit or unpreserved for our review. As substantial evidence supports the determination of petitioner's guilt, it is confirmed (see, Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
YESAWICH, Justice.
CARDONA, P.J., and MIKOLL, CREW and WHITE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 17, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)