Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David L. REYNOLDS, Appellant.
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.), entered January 30, 2004, which denied defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment convicting him of the crimes of assault in the second degree and promoting prison contraband in the first degree, after a hearing.
In 1998, defendant was convicted, after trial, of assault in the second degree and promoting prison contraband in the first degree. He was sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender to an aggregate prison term of 12 years to life, to run consecutively to his unsatisfied prison sentence; his appeal to this Court was unsuccessful (283 A.D.2d 771, 728 N.Y.S.2d 503 [2001], lv. denied 96 N.Y.2d 866, 730 N.Y.S.2d 41 [2001] ). In 2002, County Court denied defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction, without a hearing. He appealed and we reversed, and remitted the matter for a hearing on the issue of whether defendant had received the effective assistance of counsel (309 A.D.2d 976, 766 N.Y.S.2d 142 [2003] ). Following a hearing, County Court found that defendant had been afforded meaningful representation and again declined to vacate the judgment of conviction. Defendant now appeals by permission of this Court.
We are unpersuaded that defense counsel provided less than meaningful representation (see People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400 [1981] ). His assurance during pretrial plea negotiations that defendant would not be treated as a persistent felony offender (see Penal Law § 70.10[2] ), a discretionary assessment, correctly recited the proposed agreement. Counsel was powerless to affect the mandatory sentencing requirements which arose from defendant's actual status as a persistent violent felony offender (see Penal Law § 70.08), not learned until later. Accordingly, County Court properly denied the motion to vacate the judgment.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed.
PETERS, J.
MERCURE, J.P., SPAIN, CARPINELLO and ROSE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 09, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)