Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Richard M. PISACANE, an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Richard M. Pisacane, Respondent.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1982.
By decision dated October 31, 1995, and upon motion of petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, we reciprocally suspended respondent who, by order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey dated July 12, 1995, had been “immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law” (Matter of Pisacane, 220 A.D.2d 981, 632 N.Y.S.2d 986). This court's suspension, which has remained in effect to date, was to continue until the pending disciplinary matters in New Jersey were concluded and until further order of this court.
The pending disciplinary matters in New Jersey have been concluded and respondent has been found guilty in that jurisdiction of serious professional misconduct, including knowing misappropriation of clients' funds amounting to approximately $1,500,000, according to the decision of the disciplinary board of the Supreme Court of New Jersey. By order dated March 18, 1997, the Supreme Court of New Jersey disbarred respondent, effective immediately.
We grant petitioner's motion for the imposition of reciprocal discipline (see, 22 NYCRR § 806.19) and conclude that the ends of justice will be served by disbarring respondent in this State, effective immediately (see, e.g., Matter of Barlow, 220 A.D.2d 983, 632 N.Y.S.2d 988). Respondent has not appeared on or opposed the motion.
ORDERED that petitioner's motion to impose reciprocal discipline upon respondent be and hereby is granted; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent be and hereby is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent be and hereby is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and he hereby is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority or to give any opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further
ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of section 806.9 of the rules of this court (22 NYCRR § 806.9) regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 15, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)