Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Rudolph J. LOEHNER, Individually and as Executor of Norma Loehner, Deceased, Respondent, v. Stephen SIMONS, etc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
In an action to recover damages for wrongful death and pain and suffering, the defendants Stephen Simons, M.D., and East Nassau Medical Group appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oshrin, J.), dated June 14, 1996, as, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the principal sums of $300,000 for conscious pain and suffering and $300,000 for wrongful death.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the sum of $50,000 from the award for wrongful death, representing the share of the adult son of the decedent; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the plaintiff.
In a wrongful death action, an award of damages is limited to the “pecuniary injuries resulting from the decedent's death to the persons for whose benefit the action is brought” (EPTL 5-4.3[a]; see, Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority, 77 N.Y.2d 663, 569 N.Y.S.2d 915, 572 N.E.2d 598). Further, while financially independent adults may recover in wrongful death actions (see, Gonzalez v. New York City Housing Authority, supra; Tilley v. Hudson Riv. R.R. Co., 29 N.Y. 252), on the facts of this case, that part of the wrongful death award that was made on behalf of the decedent's adult son in the amount of $50,000 must be vacated because there was no evidence as to any economic injury to the son caused by his mother's death.
The appellants' remaining contentions lack merit.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 19, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)