Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Roghiegh AZIZ, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. VILLAGE OF GREAT NECK PLAZA, Defendant-Respondent, Midneck Realty Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Midneck Realty Corp. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated March 1, 1996, as, in effect, dismissed its cross claim asserted against the defendant Village of Great Neck Plaza.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
As the plaintiffs' cause of action against the Village of Great Neck Plaza (hereinafter the Village) was properly dismissed on the ground that the Village never received actual, prior, written notice of the alleged defect in the sidewalk which caused the injuries to the plaintiff Roghiegh Aziz (see, Village Law § 6-628), the defendant Midneck Realty Corp. (hereinafter Midneck) may not properly seek contribution from the Village (see, Barry v. Niagara Frontier Tr. System, 35 N.Y.2d 629, 364 N.Y.S.2d 823, 324 N.E.2d 312; O'Rourke v. Town of Smithtown, 129 A.D.2d 570, 514 N.Y.S.2d 68; Kramme v. Town of Hempstead, 100 A.D.2d 447, 474 N.Y.S.2d 108). The Supreme Court therefore correctly severed the plaintiffs' action against Midneck, and dismissed Midneck's cross claims against the Village (see also, Boscolo v. County of Nassau, 229 A.D.2d 457, 645 N.Y.S.2d 537; Fitzrandolph v. Rodrigue, 205 A.D.2d 496, 613 N.Y.S.2d 37; Strauss v. Town of Oyster Bay, 201 A.D.2d 553, 607 N.Y.S.2d 730).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 19, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)