Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Neilasan CHUNG, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), rendered September 6, 2005, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the People failed to disprove his defense of justification beyond a reasonable doubt. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant caused the victim's death by stabbing him without reason to believe that the victim, who was unarmed, was about to use deadly physical force against him (see People v. Terrero, 31 A.D.3d 672, 818 N.Y.S.2d 288; People v. Wahedi, 301 A.D.2d 541, 541-542, 752 N.Y.S.2d 904; People v. Henegan, 150 A.D.2d 606, 607, 541 N.Y.S.2d 476). Additionally, the jury could have found that the defendant had the opportunity to retreat safely without resorting to the use of deadly physical force (see Penal Law § 35.15[2][a]; People v. Wahedi, supra at 542, 752 N.Y.S.2d 904). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5] ), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Romero, 7 N.Y.3d 633, 826 N.Y.S.2d 163, 859 N.E.2d 902).
The defendant received the effective assistance of trial counsel (see People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 03, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)