Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Gabrielle D. NACHMAN, appellant, v. JENELO CORP., et al., respondents.
In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), dated January 5, 2005, as granted that branch of the defendants' cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.
The Supreme Court had no authority to dismiss the complaint merely because the subject shareholders' agreement contained a mandatory arbitration clause (see Allied Bldg. Inspectors Int. Union of Operating Engrs., Local Union No. 211, AFL-CIO v. Office of Labor Relations of the City of N.Y., 45 N.Y.2d 735, 738, 408 N.Y.S.2d 476, 380 N.E.2d 303). Rather, upon a proper and timely motion by the defendants pursuant to CPLR 7503(a), the court could have stayed the action and directed the parties to arbitrate. In the six years this action has been pending, however, the defendants never moved for relief under CPLR 7503(a). Instead, they answered the complaint, asserted a counterclaim, and even moved, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Under the circumstances, the defendants waived their right to arbitration (see Grenadeir Parking Corp. v. Landmark Assoc., 294 A.D.2d 313, 743 N.Y.S.2d 95; see also Sherrill v. Grayco Bldrs., Inc., 64 N.Y.2d 261, 272, 486 N.Y.S.2d 159, 475 N.E.2d 772). Accordingly, the order must be reversed insofar as appealed from and the complaint reinstated.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 17, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)