Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Damon JOHNSON, Also Known as Damon Lucky, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered January 30, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.
On November 15, 2000, a police-controlled confidential informant allegedly purchased cocaine at an apartment located on Lincoln Avenue in the City of Schenectady, Schenectady County. Based on this evidence, the police applied for and received a search warrant, the execution of which resulted in the seizure of crack cocaine, marihuana and drug paraphernalia. Defendant, present at the apartment, was charged in a five-count indictment with various drug-related offenses. Defendant subsequently moved to suppress the evidence as obtained in violation of his 4th Amendment rights. Supreme Court denied the motion and defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. In exchange, defendant signed a written waiver of his right to appeal and was sentenced as a second felony offender to 3 to 6 years in prison. Defendant now appeals challenging the denial of his suppression motion.
Inasmuch as the record reveals a knowing, voluntary and intelligent waiver of defendant's right to appeal, he may not now challenge the denial of his suppression motion (see People v. Kemp, 94 N.Y.2d 831, 833, 703 N.Y.S.2d 59, 724 N.E.2d 754 [1999]; People v. O'Donnell, 3 A.D.3d 599, 599, 769 N.Y.S.2d 908 [2004], lv. denied 2 N.Y.3d 764, 778 N.Y.S.2d 782, 811 N.E.2d 44 [2004]; People v. Reid, 2 A.D.3d 1061, 1062, 768 N.Y.S.2d 672 [2003], lv. denied 3 N.Y.3d 646, 782 N.Y.S.2d 417, 816 N.E.2d 207 [2004] ). Notably, here, the written waiver of the right to appeal specifically stated that defendant was precluded from appealing County Court's suppression ruling. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
PETERS, J.
CARDONA, P.J., CREW III, CARPINELLO and ROSE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 06, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)