Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Richard SALVATIERRA, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), entered February 21, 2006, which, among other things, denied defendant's motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005.
In satisfaction of two pending indictments, defendant pleaded guilty in April 1997 to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and attempted sodomy in the first degree, and County Court imposed consecutive prison sentences of five years to life and 1 1/212 to 4 1/212 years, respectively. Following the enactment of the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L. 2005, ch. 643, § 1) (hereinafter DLRA 2005), defendant applied for resentencing and County Court denied the motion, holding that defendant did not satisfy the eligibility criteria contained therein. This appeal by defendant ensued.
We affirm. “[I]n order to qualify for resentencing under [DLRA 2005], a class A-II felony offender must not be eligible for parole within three years” (People v. Thomas, 35 A.D.3d 895, 896, 826 N.Y.S.2d 456 [2006] ). As defendant was already eligible for parole at the time he applied for resentencing, County Court correctly denied his application (see People v. Owens, 45 A.D.3d 1050, 844 N.Y.S.2d 905 [2007] ). Inasmuch as defendant was plainly ineligible, as a matter of law, for resentencing, County Court quite properly denied his application and, further, did not err in doing so without a hearing (see People v. Perez, 44 A.D.3d 418, 419, 843 N.Y.S.2d 68 [2007], lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 992, 848 N.Y.S.2d 610, 878 N.E.2d 1026 [2007] ).
ORDERED that the order is affirmed.
ROSE, J.
CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, MALONE JR. and KAVANAGH, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 15, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)