Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Lance BOOKER, Petitioner, v. Dale ARTUS, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
After petitioner's urine specimen twice tested positive for cocaine, he was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance. A tier III disciplinary hearing was thereafter conducted, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report and hearing testimony, together with the positive urinalysis test results and related documentation, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Moretti v. Selsky, 46 A.D.3d 1049, 1050, 846 N.Y.S.2d 822 [2007] ). Petitioner's claim that a false positive was created because of medication administered during his recent dental surgery was sufficiently refuted by a representative from the manufacturer of the testing equipment and, in any event, presented a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Polite v. Goord, 36 A.D.3d 971, 971, 826 N.Y.S.2d 511 [2007] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and, to the extent preserved, are without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 15, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)