Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Robert MAJORS, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Latella, J.), dated October 19, 2007, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of the same court rendered December 5, 2001, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree (two counts), robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed.
The defendant originally was convicted of the charges at issue after a jury trial. The defendant successfully moved, on the ground of juror misconduct, to vacate the judgment. The defendant was retried and convicted after a nonjury trial. The defendant again moved to vacate the judgment of conviction against him, claiming that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at his second trial by virtue of his attorney's failure to call an alibi witness. Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant's claim is not procedurally barred on the ground that sufficient facts appeared on the record to permit adequate review of the claim on direct appeal (see CPL 440.10[2][b] ). Nonetheless, on the merits, it appears from the parties' submissions in support of and in opposition to the defendant's motion that the defendant received meaningful representation at his second trial (see People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of his motion to vacate the judgment of conviction.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 24, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)