Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PKG ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., respondents, v. MILE DEVELOPMENT CORP., d/b/a Beechwood Organization, et al., appellants.
In an action to recover a finder's fee in connection with the acquisition of real property, the defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (LaMarca, J.), entered November 5, 2007, which, upon a decision of the same court dated October 10, 2007, made after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $540,000.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the facts, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff the principal sum of $540,000 and substituting therefor a provision awarding the plaintiff the principal sum of $360,000; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for a recalculation of prejudgment interest and the entry of an appropriate amended judgment thereafter.
Upon review of a determination rendered after a nonjury trial, this Court's authority “is as broad as that of the trial court,” and this Court may “render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account in a close case the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses” (Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v. Town of Bedford, 60 N.Y.2d 492, 499, 470 N.Y.S.2d 350, 458 N.E.2d 809; see Perfect Crown Vic, Inc. v. Douce Hacking Corp., 56 A.D.3d 448, 865 N.Y.S.2d 910). Upon our review of the record, we find that an award of $360,000 is warranted by the facts.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 24, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)