Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert H. WICKS, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano Jr., J.), rendered January 26, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of driving while intoxicated (two counts), aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree and attempted robbery in the third degree.
An August 2004 indictment charged defendant with various crimes. Resolving the indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated, aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree and attempted robbery in the third degree. Defendant also waived indictment and pleaded guilty in satisfaction of a superior court information which charged him with driving while intoxicated in October 2004. County Court sentenced defendant to concurrent prison terms of 1 to 3 years for each of his convictions.
Defendant's sole contention on this appeal is that his waiver of indictment was jurisdictionally defective because the record does not reflect that he executed the written waiver in open court with his attorney present. Although the plea minutes are silent with regard to defendant's signing of the waiver, County Court's order approving the waiver expressly indicates that defendant executed it in open court in the presence of his attorney (see People v. Rivera, 24 A.D.3d 367, 369-370, 806 N.Y.S.2d 537 [2005]; see also People v. Hill, 269 A.D.2d 404, 405, 702 N.Y.S.2d 390 [2000], lv. denied 94 N.Y.2d 920, 708 N.Y.S.2d 360, 729 N.E.2d 1159 [2000] ). Accordingly, we are satisfied that defendant's waiver of indictment was in compliance with CPL 195.20 and we affirm the judgment of conviction.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
PETERS, J.
CARDONA, P.J., SPAIN, CARPINELLO and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 05, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)