Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carmen M. CROSS, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Madison County (McDermott, J.), rendered January 3, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of the crime of sodomy in the third degree.
Defendant waived indictment by a grand jury and agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging him with two counts of sodomy in the third degree. Pursuant to a negotiated plea bargain, defendant thereafter pleaded guilty to both counts, executed a written waiver of appeal and was sentenced to consecutive terms of imprisonment of 1 to 3 years. Defendant now appeals.
Contrary to defendant's initial contention, we conclude that he validly waived his right to appeal inasmuch as he executed a written appeal waiver which indicated that he had discussed his appellate options with his attorney and was waiving his right to appeal knowingly and voluntarily (see People v. Fludd, 33 A.D.3d 1124, 1125, 822 N.Y.S.2d 821 [2006] ). Given that, defendant is precluded from advancing his further argument that his sentence was harsh and excessive (see People v. Tedesco, 38 A.D.3d 1102, 1103, 833 N.Y.S.2d 272 [2007] ). As for defendant's assertion that his sentences should have been ordered to run concurrently, a review of the plea minutes satisfies us that his sexual abuse of the victim was perpetrated through two separate and distinct acts occurring on separate occasions in August 1999, thus warranting the imposition of consecutive sentences (see Penal Law § 70.25[2]; People v. Harrington, 3 A.D.3d 737, 739, 770 N.Y.S.2d 792 [2004] ). Finally, with respect to defendant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, we find that defendant received an advantageous plea to the extent that it reduced his sentence exposure and, aside from speculation, nothing in the record casts doubt upon his counsel's effectiveness (see People v. Williams, 35 A.D.3d 971, 973, 825 N.Y.S.2d 322 [2006] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
ROSE, J.
MERCURE, J.P., PETERS, SPAIN and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 05, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)