Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Kevin JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner became agitated after a correction officer informed him that he was getting a roommate. He then refused the officer's directives, used profanity toward the officer and threatened to kill the officer when he was released from prison. As a result, the officer prepared a misbehavior report charging him with violating inmate movement regulations, refusing double-bunking, refusing a direct order and making threats. At the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of making threats, but the other charges were dismissed. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
The detailed misbehavior report provides substantial evidence supporting the determination finding petitioner guilty of making threats (see Matter of Russell v. Selsky, 22 A.D.3d 998, 999, 802 N.Y.S.2d 800 [2005], lv. dismissed 7 N.Y.3d 750, 819 N.Y.S.2d 866, 853 N.E.2d 236 [2006]; Matter of Goncalves v. Donnelly, 9 A.D.3d 721, 721, 779 N.Y.S.2d 842 [2004] ). Petitioner's claim that he had prior difficulties with the officer who wrote the report and that it was written in retaliation presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Applewhite v. Goord, 22 A.D.3d 985, 986, 802 N.Y.S.2d 389 [2005]; Matter of Russell v. Selsky, supra at 999, 802 N.Y.S.2d 800). Therefore, we find no reason to disturb respondent's determination.
Petitioner's remaining claims are lacking in merit and/or unpreserved for appellate review.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 05, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)