Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
TOWN OF PUTNAM VALLEY, et al., respondents, v. Thomas CABOT, et al., defendants, Alexander Kaspar, appellant.
In an action, inter alia, to permanently enjoin the defendants from conducting logging activity on real property owned by the defendants, the defendant Alexander Kaspar appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (O'Rourke, J.), dated March 5, 2007, as granted that branch of the motion of the plaintiff Town of Putnam Valley which was to preliminarily enjoin him from conducting certain commercial and industrial activities on the subject property, and failed to require the plaintiffs John Spina and Howard Olsen to give an undertaking.
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by adding a provision thereto that the plaintiff Town of Putnam Valley shall be liable for any damages sustained by the defendant Alexander Kaspar if it is finally determined that it was not entitled to an injunction in accordance with CPLR 2512(1); as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Putnam County, to fix the maximum amount of the Town's liability for damages.
The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the plaintiff Town of Putnam Valley which was to preliminarily enjoin the defendant Alexander Kaspar from conducting certain commercial and industrial activities on the subject property (see Town of Dover Town Bd. v. Cascino, 41 A.D.3d 834, 839 N.Y.S.2d 169; First Franklin Sq. Assoc., LLC v. Franklin Sq. Prop. Account, 15 A.D.3d 529, 533, 790 N.Y.S.2d 527).
Contrary to Kaspar's contention, the Supreme Court did not err in declining to require the private plaintiffs, John Spina and Howard Olsen, to post an undertaking, as those plaintiffs did not join the Town's motion for the preliminary injunction (see CPLR 6312[b] ). Kaspar correctly concedes that the Town is exempt from giving an undertaking pursuant to CPLR 2512(1) (see City of Yonkers v. Federal Sugar Ref. Co., 221 N.Y. 206, 210, 116 N.E. 998; Town Bd. of Town of Southampton v. 1320 Entertainment, 236 A.D.2d 387, 388, 653 N.Y.S.2d 364). However, in granting the preliminary injunction, the Supreme Court was required to fix the limit of the Town's liability for damages if it is ultimately determined that the Town was not entitled to an injunction (see CPLR 2512[1]; CPLR 6312[b]; cf. Bonded Concrete, Inc. v. Town of Saugerties, 42 A.D.3d 852, 856-857, 841 N.Y.S.2d 152). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Putnam County, to fix that maximum amount.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 08, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)